Depth of Field (Kate)

• 

By strategically using a larger aperture, Diane Arbus creates a more dramatic photograph. The short depth of field really draws the viewer in. There is a very minimal, dimly lit background, (which is also out of focus) so there is no other option than to look at the model in the picture and fully analyze him. Arbus uses such a short depth of field, that even the man’s hands are out of focus, leaving only a portion of his body in full focus. This all contributes to the gripping portrait of this man and draws attention to the subtle highlights and shadows created by the lighting and contours of his body.

I believe this incredibly famous photograph by Diane Arbus is made even more powerful by the use of a deep depth of field. Keeping more of the scene in focus allows the viewer to truly take in the scene, and notice details that may not have been seen with a shorter depth of field. For example, the viewer can clearly see what looks to be the couple’s son setting up his own pool (possibly in attempt to entertain him while his parents sun bathe). Subtler details, like what seems to be the corner of a swing set are as well made visible by the strategic choice of a narrower aperture. The deeper depth of field brings this picture to life and allows the viewer a chance to form a deeper connection with the family.